CRank: 5Score: 21820

I couldn't agree more with that statement. Just wished a lot more companies understood the phrase "Less is more" Call of Duty is one franchise that really needed to grasped this phrase, but they are not alone.

1641d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

I will support both. Im too much of a gamer to miss out on certain games. It drives me crazy lol

1642d ago 2 agree3 disagreeView comment

Better question is what would justify a $600 console? 1440p @ 120 FPS on every game minimum would justify the cost for me.

1642d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

I look at this , and I see power. I see Microsoft saying we want a powerful console, so just get the parts needed to accomplish this, and we will build the design of the console around the parts. I have a great feeling about this. I feel much more confident by looking at this design that it will delver the power Microsoft is stating. Now i see playing games at 120 FPS.

1645d ago 6 agree1 disagreeView comment

Just to add. EA access pay a $29 a year, and here you go play these games. No added cost. The same with XBOX game pass. Imagine what would have happened if google's paying modeled worked???

1663d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

Speaking for myself, but i rather have a PC or console and just download the game. I would never want to stream a game. In the event I want to play something on the road I have no issues using my phone to play games. I like playing the simple games on my phone, and playing the more demanding games on a PC or console at home. Streaming is not for me, and definitely not with the paying model google implemented. Wow I couldn't believe it when I read it. I have to pay a subscription to buy ga...

1663d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

Stadia's business practice is beyond stupid!!! I still cant get how when it was discussed about charging a subscription fee , along with now having to buy the game that it was actually a good idea. That has to be the stupidest thing ever!!!

Netflix charging a fee then charging to see shows and movies would have destroyed them. How can google make such a DUMB decision???

A mall charging a entrance fee, so you can now shop at the stores lol

1666d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

The fact they they thought paying for a subscription, and then you have to buy the game was enough for me to see this is a FAIL! That's like a mall charging a entrance fee , so you can go inside to shop.

1669d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Way too early to make this claim. Now if they game is declining in viewership, along with active players in a 2 month span. I will then go ahead and make that claim. When COD comes out it will slow down. Then after 2 to 3 weeks of that releases we then have to see what happens. I feel Fortnite is now one of those games you will take a break from but then comeback to at times to mess around.

1701d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Exactly the reason why I will not buy COD once again. I hate dealing with a player a two during a match that have a OP weapon due to the loot box. Eff that BS!

1716d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

I will be not buying because I want to send a message to both Sony and Microsoft that exclusive deals wont be tolerated by us games anymore. I probably alone on this , but that's cool I know I made my move.I own a PS4

1722d ago 2 agree1 disagreeView comment

Xbox owners will consider not buying it because it effects them, PS4 owners wont care because it doesn't effect them. I own both consoles, but I' am tired of the whole exclusive time shit, so Ill pass and hopefully one day all of us as gamers can tell these companies FUCK YOU if you want to keep doing this exclusive shit, and not buy the game,

1724d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

Homerun!!! Well said.

1724d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

I also want a gaming PC. I own the XBOX one x and a PS4, but man PC gaming is at another level. I just cant afford it at this time. IN regards to Stadia its not for me. I rather deal with something in the lines of XBOX gamepass. I get the actual game, and not all things rely on streaming,.

1725d ago 2 agree3 disagreeView comment

wow that was annoying!!! Why act so extra??? I'am all for being excited, but dont over do that shit. You make the whole experience just straight out annoying.

1736d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

Toyota wants to remove their cars from a video game, but allows it in movies like fast and furious. Where crazy stunts and illegal acts are happening through out the movie. WTF??? lol

1759d ago 3 agree3 disagreeView comment

I understand this is a alpha build, but the A.I was pretty bad. I cant get into a game where the combat against the enemy feels shallow. Ill keep an eye out on it, and if this area is improved I will definitely purchase it.

1760d ago 7 agree0 disagreeView comment

Microtransactons don't ruin a game if its purely cosmetic, only time it is bad if its play to win. I was a fan of MW1-2 and 3, and Black ops 1-2 and 3, so for this to be called the best of them all I'm anxious to see.

1765d ago 1 agree7 disagreeView comment

It would be great if lootboxes were totally removed and never to be implemented at any point, Micro transactions can only be specific items and not a lottery.

1771d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

This is not going to fix the situation. Just the mere fact that there is a chance for that pay to win weapon. People will still pay plenty to get it. I don't like it. It should be just as obvious as Fortnite. You pay this and you get this,. No gimmicks just straight up purchase for what you want. This truly doesn't help.

1772d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment